English Journal
English Journal is ¥'s award-winning journal of ideas for English language arts teachers in junior and senior high schools and middle schools.
Columns and Column Editors
Black Youth FuturesStephanie Toliver
Critical Approaches to Literature Carlin Borsheim-Black
Critical Curations: Developing Rich Text Sets Nicole Amato and Katie Priske
The Future is Now Melinda McBee Orzulak andDanielle Lillge
Intersectional LGBTQIA+ Identities Stephanie Anne Shelton
Navigating Generative AI Brady Nash
Poetry Paul Thomas
Reimagining Research Tiffany DeJaynes
Teaching in a Time of Censorship Ann D. David, Katharine Covino, and Natalie Chase
Teaching Multilingual Learners in ELA Classrooms Melody Zoch
Teaching in a Time of Censorship
Column Editors: Ann D. David, University of the Incarnate Word;Katharine Covino, Fitchburg State University; and Natalie Chase
Uncompromising and closed-minded people seek to ban books, inspect and approve curriculum, and level ad hominem attacks on teachers. For example, the recent Supreme Court decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor allows parents to opt out of school experiences that are not in line with their religion, focusing specifically on LGBTQIA+ literature. State legislation continues to restrict what kinds of books can be taught, including labeling LGBTQIA+ books as “obscene.” At the same time, some of the Trump administration’s executive orders focus on restricting diversity, equity, and inclusion in K–12 schools. All of this serves to further intensify the climate of fear in which teachers and students are reading in schools. That said, teachers and their allies have power, too. Elections for school boards, even in politically conservative areas, are not being won by people campaigning on book bans. And many states are enacting “Right to Read” legislation. This shift grows out of allyship within and between people and organizations invested in schools having a richer curriculum that includes diverse books.
Much of the recent writing about censorship has been crafted by and for librarians, but we want to hear more from English teachers and their allies. There are lots of ways into the conversation. Ideas you could explore include how you:
- Use book rationales in your planning or advocacy
- Create and nurture alliances with colleagues and parents
- Collaborate with school administrators
- Navigate text selection, specifically with books that are frequently challenged
- Engage in challenging conversations with students around those texts
- Use ¥ resources like book rationales and relevant position statements on students’ right to read, red flagging, and classroom libraries to support your use of diverse and high-quality texts, etc.
The column editors see the work of this moment as helping students read and select books that both support and challenge their thinking, recognizing that teachers are the professionals best positioned to select books for their students. Sharing stories of your experiences will help other teachers reclaim—or find—their voices and agency while expanding their professional know-how. Please send inquiries and submissions of manuscripts of 1,200–1,400 words as Word or Google documents to Ann David (addavid@uiwtx.edu) for consideration.
Black Youth Futures
Column Editor: Stephanie Toliver, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Over the past few decades, calls have abounded to prominently foreground the language and literacy practices of Black youth. Scholars have called for more attention to the historical literacies of Black people in hopes that educators see the inherent genius within Black youth (Muhammad 13). They have asked for teachers to consider the ways in which Black youth engage in play with text, genre, language, and each other (Baker-Bell 8; Gaunt 3; Bryan 74). They have demanded that educators uplift Black young people as they challenge the anti-Blackness embedded within school systems (Coles 36; Love 12), and they have implored educational stakeholders to make space for Black youth to imagine worlds in which they are free to experience the full range of humanity: love, anger, joy, excitement, sadness, pride, hope, and all the emotions in between (Toliver 85; Turner 128).
It is within these calls that this column exists. Specifically, this column is dedicated to the teachers, teacher educators, community members, and young people who are committed to the liberatory futures of Black youth. It is for all who imagine and create alongside young Black folx to ensure that the next generation of Black youth can thrive. With this in mind, this column welcomes commentary that attends to the expansive language and literacy lives of Black young people. Toward this goal, authors might consider questions such as the following: What texts (written by and about Black people) have you found particularly useful in the classroom? How have you made space for Black joy, Black dreams, Black genius, and Black pride in your classroom, research, and/or community work? What assignments have you created that enable Black youth to voice their concerns about the world? What does the future of education, schools, or schooling look like for Black youth?
Rather than just accepting traditional practitioner articles (i.e., research essay, nonfiction, or narrative nonfiction), this column aims to be as expansive as Black youth’s literacies. Thus, poems, narratives, comics, paintings, and the like are also welcome. Please send submissions of 1,200-1,400 words as a Word document to Stephanie Toliver at stoliver@illinois.edu. Inquiries about potential submissions are also welcomed.
Critical Approaches to Literature
Column Editor: Carlin Borsheim-Black
In this column, authors present pedagogical possibilities for teaching literature in critical ways. While critical approaches to literature study take up, examine, confront, and address systems of power, they can also illuminate joy, creativity, community, and agency as forms of resistance.
This column offers possibilities for engaging with literature as a vehicle for opening up justice-oriented conversation and just futures. Importantly, columns target the how of literature study—that is, ways in which teachers, students, and stakeholders of ELA exercise agency—rather than the what. Column authors may illuminate literature study approaches utilizing a variety of genres. We welcome columns that examine ways to teach subversively with canonical texts, foster critical literacies using young adult literature, pair literary nonfiction with current events, or decenter the role of specific texts entirely. Columns should be 1,200-1,400 words in length and can be sent to carlinborsheim@gmail.com.
Reimagining Research
Column Editor: Tiffany DeJaynes, Lehman College, City University of New York
This column aims to highlight thoughtful conversations about youth as knowledgegenerators, rethink the dominance of the traditional research paper in English language artsclassrooms, and consider the ways in which young people’s original research can inform public policies and activism. As such, the column publishes accounts of youth conducting research in innovative ways in schools and communities; research innovations might include collaborative, multimodal, digital, action-oriented, community-focused, or arts-based practices.
Educators employing research practices that creatively engage young people in criticalparticipatory action research, archival research, working with unconventional sources, orcreatively sharing and disseminating research and more are invited to share their curricularapproaches and lessons learned. Please contact Tiffany DeJaynes to discuss ideas for the column or send manuscripts of 1,200–1,400 words as Word documents to tiffany.dejaynes@lehman.cuny.edu for consideration.
Teaching Multilingual Learners in ELA Classrooms
Column Editor: Melody Zoch, University of North Carolina–Greensboro
Multilingual learners (MLs) are the fastest-growing group of students entering US public schools. In the next few years, an estimated one out of every four school-aged children will speak a language other than English at home. ELA teachers must be deft at addressing the needs of MLs, which can include drawing on their funds of knowledge (Moll et al., 1992), embracing their identities as MLs, and understanding the challenges language-minoritized learners and their families may experience. Too often, middle- and high school spaces privilege monolingual instructional models where English language and literacy proficiency are considered the norm. This is counter to the needs of MLs, whose linguistic repertoires should be honored rather than repressed or punished.
This column seeks to amplify the voices of ELA teachers who are committed to the growth and well-being of MLs. The column editor invites submissions that feature research, examples of practices, and reflections on practice that support MLs in the ELA classroom. All submissions should engage asset-based approaches to discussing and supporting MLs in equitable ways. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, the incorporation of translanguaging practices (García et al., 2017), how identity work and affirmation are explored in the ELA classroom, and using culturally sustaining practices (Paris & Alim, 2014). Questions authors might explore include: In what ways does language inter¬sect with other identities? In what ways do you incorporate fami¬lies and the community in your teaching of MLs? In what ways do you engage MLs in exploring activism and social justice issues in the ELA classroom? What are some critical incidents (Tripp, 1993) that have shaped your teaching of MLs? What specific strategies and texts have supported your MLs?
Please send inquiries and submissions of 1,200–1,400 words as a Word document to mzoch@uncg.edu.
LGBTQIA+ Intersectional Identities
Column Editor: Stephanie Anne Shelton, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
The acronym LGBTQIA+ incorporates ranges of identities andexpressions related to genders and sexualities, including lesbian,gay, bisexual, trans, queer, questioning, intersex, and asexualindividuals. LGBTQIA+ youth are present in classrooms world-wide and are among the most vulnerable; however, substantialresearch demonstrates that supportive teachers make incredibledifferences in LGBTQIA+ students’ lives and school experiences.
LGBTQIA+ students’ needs are shaped by more than genderidentity, gender expression, or sexuality. Students navigateassigned, assumed, and self-asserted social categories, for example, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic class, ablebodiedness, andlanguage usage. They also live and learn in specific geographicand cultural contexts. Their LGBTQIA+ identities constantlyintersect with these many factors; efforts to provide equitable,respectful, and effective learning spaces necessitate intersectionalunderstandings of LGBTQIA+ issues in schools.
This column seeks to share English educators’ stories on howthey learn about, recognize, and affirm intersectional LGBTQIA+identities. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to,instructional strategies that explore LGBTQIA+ issues as intersecting with other identities or contexts; case studies of efforts toengage students or colleagues in intersectional considerations ofLGBTQIA+ issues; and reflective narratives that explore howawareness of intersectional LGBTQIA+ identities has shapedteachers’ professional identities.
Inquiries, submissions, or suggestions for future columnsshould be directed to Stephanie Anne Shelton at sashel@unc.edu. Submissions of 1,200–1,400 words should be sent asattachments.
Critical Curations
Column Editors: Nicole Amato and Katie Priske, University of Iowa
“Curate: Make meaning for oneself and others by collecting, organizing, and sharing resources of personal relevance.” —American Association of School Librarians, 2018
Critical curation invites both students and teachers to take critical stances and “explore multiple perspectives, challenge dominant ideologies, and include marginalized voices within and beyond the literary canon” (Lechtenberg 3). Alongside the importance of curation is the importance of representation, which as Hamad asserts has “real world consequences” (27). Work around the importance of curation and representation has been ongoing in English language arts spaces. We align this column with the work of #DisruptTexts, asserting that curriculum choices are never neutral, and curriculum must center Black, Indigenous, and other voices of color (Ebarvia et al.).
We believe critical curation of texts in the ELA classroom is an exploratory practice that honors curiosity and inquiry. These curations aim to support teachers in critical literacy and critical inquiry work within and beyond the classroom. This column is guided by the following questions: 1) What themes and issues are urgent points of discussion in 7-12 literacy classrooms? 2) How can ELA teachers and librarians collaboratively curate multimodal and multigenre text sets for their students? We invite essays dedicated to exploring these questions while curating texts (broadly defined) around critical topics for discussion in ELA classrooms, such as but not limited to race, gender, sexuality, class, and ability. We aim to curate and review 3-5 texts per column around a central topic.
Please contact Nicole Amato and Katie Priske to discuss ideas for the column or send your essays of 1,200–1,400 words as Word documents for consideration.
The Future Is Now
Column Editors: Melinda McBee Orzulak, Bradley University
Danielle Lillge, Illinois State University
For nearly 15 years, the “Future Is Now” roundtable sessions at the ¥ Annual Convention have provided opportunities for beginning English language arts (ELA) teachers to present their scholarship. Inspired by the generative community in these sessions (early career voices, their questions, and their contributions to the field alongside mentors), this column explores inquiries related to ELA teachers who are navigating the early stages of their professional learning journeys as preservice or inservice teachers with 1 to 4 years of teaching experience. We seek to highlight voices of early career ELA teachers as well as those whose scholarship centers these teachers’ voices and experiences.
We invite column authors to share the inquiries that have sustained early career ELA teachers’ learning and instruction. Such inquiries may include research focused on these teachers’ experiences and professional identity formation, or other findings with clear implications for early career teachers and their inquiries. Instead of easy fixes, simple solutions, or truisms, we hope to highlight what we gain from assuming an inquiry stance in scholarly conversation with others as we look to the future by celebrating the nuance and complexity of ELA teaching. Therefore, we encourage authors to illuminate the origins of their question in relation to their own experiences as well as in relation to other voices—those of students, colleagues, mentors, researchers, parents, authors, creators, or other stakeholders. And we urge authors to explore layered considerations that lead to possibilities for their own and other teachers’ future learning, teaching, research, or creative activity.
Please send submissions of 1,200–1,400 words as a Word document to the editors, Melinda McBee Orzulak and Danielle Lillge, at EJfutureisnow@gmail.com. Include in your email your full name(s), school affiliation(s), and the main email contact for the lead author, if the submission is coauthored.
Poetry
Editor: Paul Thomas, Furman University
In the pages ofEnglish Journal, we look to publish well-crafted poems that connect our readers to topics central to English education: the impact of reading and writing on young people, words and language, classroom stories, and reflections on teaching and learning. Poetry reminds us, as educators, how to live in this world.
Submit your work by emailing an attachment topaul.thomas@furman.edu. Use the subject line “Poetry Submission for Review.” The first page of the attached document should be a cover sheet that includes your name, address, and email, as well as a two-sentence biographical sketch. In your bio, include how long you have been a member of ¥, if applicable, and a publishable contact email. Following the cover sheet, include one to five original poems in the same document. Finally, please fill out and attach this form granting English Journal permission to publish your poem:
Though we welcome work of any length, shorter pieces (30 lines and under) often work best for the journal. Poems must be original and not previously published. Simultaneous submissions are welcome, though writers must immediately withdraw from consideration any poems that are to be published elsewhere by contacting the editor via email.
Poets whose work is published will receive two complimentary copies of the issue in which their work appears. Additional inquiries about poetry submissions may be directed to the editor atpaul.thomas@furman.edu. We look forward to reading and celebrating your work.
Telescopes: Possibilities in YAL
Arianna Banack
Navigating Generative AI
Brady Nash, University of Florida
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)—and conversations on what to do about it—has become ubiquitous. Across the field of English education, scholars are debating the ethics and applications of GenAI tools within English classrooms (Enriquez et al., 2023; Nash et al., 2023; Young et al., 2024). Many teachers have begun incorporating GenAI into their planning practices, into their writing instruction, or as a topic of study in their curricula. Many have participated in the creation of new departmental or school policies. And all of us have watched as people working both in and outside of schools have tried to figure out what to do about a technology with great potential to reshape major areas of life, for good or for ill.
Of central concern to English educators is whether particular uses of GenAI support or supplant students’ writing, reading, and learning, as well as the ethical questions raised by GenAI. Outside of classroom-specific applications, GenAI poses a host of concerns, including the propensity to provide false information in authoritative tones, the theft of artistic content, the ecological impact of the infrastructure required to power AI platforms, and the ways in which GenAI subtly reproduces the societal biases and prejudices of the language from which it draws (Tacheva & Ramasubramanian, 2023). In short, there is a lot to explore when considering the impact of these technologies in and outside of schools.
This column seeks to amplify the voices of English educators who are exploring the role of GenAI in secondary classroom settings. The column editor invites submissions that feature research, examples of practice, and reflections from a variety of perspectives about any aspect of GenAI in relation to English teaching. Possible topics include the use of AI-infused tools for reading and writing support, composition in partnership with multimodal AI platforms, ethical considerations when employing GenAI for assessment and feedback, , explorations of the critical media and digital literacies needed to engage with GenAI platforms, and examinations of how GenAI engagement intersects with issues of race, language, or culture. Please send inquiries and submissions of 1,200–1,400 words as Word documents tobradylnash@gmail.com.
For general EJ Submission Guidelines, click here.